hard📋 Customer-Facing Case Study
A logistics company wants to reduce detention fees by 20%. How do you approach this?
**Background:** Detention fees are charges incurred when a truck waits at a facility beyond the agreed free time. Your client (a large 3PL) is paying $4M/year in detention fees and wants to cut that by 20%.
They have data from their TMS (Transportation Management System) including: load details, driver check-in/out times, facility dwell times, appointment times.
**Your job as the FDE:**
1. How do you scope and prioritize this problem?
2. What data analysis would you do first?
3. What solution would you propose, and how would you validate it?
💡 Hints (3)
- 1.Start with data, not solutions. What does the distribution of detention events look like? Which facilities? Which carriers?
- 2.The 80/20 rule almost certainly applies here — a few facilities likely drive most fees.
- 3.Consider both predictive (alert before detention happens) and operational (fix the process) solutions.
✅ View Solution
**Discovery:**
- Pull detention events by facility, carrier, time-of-day, day-of-week
- Hypothesis: 20% of facilities → 80% of fees (confirm with data)
- Identify root causes per cluster: missed appointments? Slow unloading? Staffing gaps?
**Analysis:**
- Average dwell time vs scheduled dwell time per facility
- Correlation: which appointment slots have highest detention rate?
- Carrier-level analysis: is detention concentrated with specific drivers/carriers?
**Proposed solution:**
- Real-time dwell time alerting: when a truck hits 80% of free time, auto-alert the facility manager
- Appointment slot optimization: reschedule high-risk slots to low-contention windows
- Carrier scorecard: surface detention rate per carrier to procurement team
**Validation:**
- Pilot at top 3 detention facilities
- A/B test: treated vs control appointment slots
- Target: 20% reduction in avg dwell time at pilot sites within 60 days